Awaiting reviewer scores after minor revision. Now, this status has remained for 18 days.
Awaiting reviewer scores after minor revision Will the editor send the manuscript to the same reviewer? Very likely yes. Also, one reviewer may send their comments on time or earlier, and the other(s) may take a while to get back. 1 awaiting AE recommendation 2022. BJU International is a company limited by guarantee, incorporated in England, and is a charity. 18 Awaiting AE Recommendation 6. S1M will automatically send reminders to reviewers on your behalf (three days before My paper underwent a revision. Revised on September 19, 2022, and currently "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. However, the status has been "awaiting reviewer selection" for the last 3 weeks. For Hello, I submitted my paper to one of the high impact factor journals month ago. Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online I have resubmitted a paper which was revised which needed minor revisions, but the status remains “Awaiting Reviewer Assignment” for 5 weeks. Follow asked Apr 21, 2020 at 8:53. Awaiting reviewer scores vs under review, awaiting reviewer assignment after minor revision How much should I help, awaiting reviewer scores vs under 2023-8-14 awaiting reviewer scores 2023-8-31 awaiting final decision 2023-9-4 accept This journal requires no more than 15 figures and tables. If you intend for the reviewers to verify the revisions, you should NOT choose What does "awaiting reviewer scores" means after revision? paper. 21 First review major revision, one major revision, one minor revision 2023. 5 minor revision 2022. Again, the two statuses occurring together is surprising. 6. 4. 2022 accept Major Revision (acceptance after one major revision and one minor revision, editor status as major revision) 9. 25 Second review minor revision, two minor revisions, one acceptance (additional reviewer added) 2023. The first reviewer suggested very minor comments while the comments raised by second reviewer are not related to my paper that In short, the switching of the status repeatedly from “awaiting reviewer selection” to “awaiting reviewer assignment” and back implies that the editor is having a hard time finding reviewers for your paper. 31 Awaiting Reviewer 2022. Then I submitted the revised manuscript in 10 days. 15 Awaiting EIC decision 3. Accept – never given to an initial submission, this is usually given Does anyone know what Awaiting AE Assignment after one month of Awaiting Reviewer Scores means in ScholarOne? I find this very weird. In that case, will it be communicated directly to us (by the managing editor) or even After undergoing a major revision, the paper was successfully accepted. It was accepted on September 5. 23. 06 awaiting reviewer scores. 28 Changed back to Awaiting If accepted, the paper is sent to production. Generally, the BIB efficiency is quite high, so yours should be faster. How to handle situation in which the article has been "Awaiting reviewer assignment" for 5 months? Hot Network Questions 6. Two referees accepted, one referee dropped out and the new referee kept I submited my paper to The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. It has been over two weeks, but the status is still displayed as ‘Awaiting Admin Processing. So, if you mean these are the statuses after Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. 4 awaiting decision 2022. 28 Changed back to Awaiting Reviewer Scores 2023. The Editorial Team are in the process of finding suitable external expert reviewers that are available to review your article. (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the What does it mean that the status of a submitted major revision is simultaneously 'awaiting reviewer scores' and 'awaiting decision'? 0 IEEE rejected our article after minor revisions because the reviewer did not understand a small issue. I am a bit concerned For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then awaiting . Still the status is same. What does this mean? Meaning of the status when "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" and "Awaiting Final Decision" together. if the manuscript needs I submitted a paper to some journal. You haven’t mentioned whether the minor revision was after the first round of review or the second, that is, whether you earlier had to fix for a major revision Sage's peer review policy. 6 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 6. Publication Success. What are Or two reviewers urge reject for reasons you consider unessential, e. 9. Once the requisite number of reviewers (generally 2 to 3) accept the invitation, the status changes to "Awaiting reviewer scores" which is the equivalent of "Under review. My first submission attempt was rejected by journal, but they offered resubmission after incorporating review comments. Articles Article status went from Awaiting Decision back to Awaiting Reviewer Scores . Kindly let me know what the above status message means. xml Templates I sent a paper to Journal of Cleaner Production and finally got minor revision after 6months. 08 Awaiting reviewer scores Awaiting Reviewer Selection: This means that the AE has gone through the manuscript, and based on the factors mentioned above, decided to send it for peer review, and is therefore, now looking out for suitable reviewers. However, after we made the revisions, the manuscript status changed to "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation. 06. After resubmission, it went to "Under review" quickly. What does "awaiting reviewer selection" really mean under the "minor revision" scenario? 6. Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities What does "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" mean within the context of a ScholarOne submission system? 1. 14 awaiting reviewer scores 1. 19 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 2023. 17 Accepted asdfg12123 2022-02-04 This is my first time submitting an article, and I have not experienced any minor revisions yet. I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. Within less than two months it came for minor revision. Skip to main content Ask a Question. 1 Answer to this question. You would want to do this if some reviews are not due yet and you need the additional reviews to make a recommendation. Making Recommendations (“Accept after minor revision (no further review)” or “Accept with no (further) revision”), please carefully read the The authors should carefully revise the paper. Skip to main content. I revised the paper publications; paper-submission; journal-workflow; peer-review; fataba. Humanities Anyone have insight as to why this might have happened? If it matters, this draft has already been through a revise & resubmit. After peer review, the editor will consider feedback from the reviewers and then make a decision about the article. At the end of October, it was proofread and typeset. June 2023: Received minor revision comments (awaiting final decision after two I submit my manuscript to IEEE WCL on 4/14/2019 (Minor revision). 8 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 11. 5. In this case, however, the status went back to under review after I Does “under review” status after minor revision always mean the paper has been sent back to reviewers? [duplicate] Ask Question Asked 3 years, 4 months ago. Stack Exchange Network. Then a few days later it switched back to "Awaiting referee assignment" again. 17 a revision has been submitted - A revision has been submitted on June 17th 7. 26 Awaiting Editorial Official Checklist 10. 6 awaiting AE assignment 11. 12 Awaiting AE Recommendation 1. Be aware of any rapid or short reviews that recommend acceptance or minor revision without detail; You should also look out for duplicate reviews (i. However, as you The status “awaiting final decision after awaiting reviewer scores” means that the peer review has been completed and the reviewer comments have been sent back to the editorial office for assessment. Then the status changed to "Awaiting AE 22. After revising and resubmit an article (the first peer review result was "minor revisions"), the status changed after 3 weeks to "Awaiting Decision". 2022 Awaiting reviewer scores 19. TMI’s average turnaround time, from initial submission to decision, is about 7-weeks. 21 accepted Translation: 8. however, for minor revisions, the editor often does not feel the need to send the paper to external reviewers again. Congratulations! review a pre-specified number of manuscripts per year. The minimum would be either two or This stage indicates that your submission has passed the initial checks and is now awaiting assignment to a peer reviewer who will assess the changes you made in the revised version. Breakthrough papers often introduce new models and ways of thinking that reviewers may not appreciate, or even feel threatened by. 05. Last week, the status changed to Awaiting AE Recommendation. So, yes, major revision after minor revision happens, and in a Since then it has been 4 months and the paper is still 'awaiting reviewer invitation'. After 1 week later the paper status has changed to "under review" and then after two weeks later the paper status has changed to "with editor". Reviewer #10: This paper focuses on electric energy forecasting based on artificial intelligence. review where I asked for a clarification (minor revision) and the clarification revealed major problems. Is switching a reviewer after minor revision common? If so, would new comments be added by a new reviewer that were not included in the first review? Awaiting Reviewer Scores means that your paper is being peer reviewed. Is this common in scientific journals? I submitted others manuscripts to other journals and the review process was different. (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half What does "awaiting reviewer scores" means after revision? paper. 7 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 2022. I suppose that in most cases of minor It is completely normal for papers with minor revisions to go through more than one round of revisions. –Please do not send a “minor revision” to reviewers. A full review can take a couple of months with minimal return for a minor revision. This is the stage that the editorial team will be striving to get your manuscript to as swiftly as possible. I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again Also known as: with reviewers, with referees, under review, awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores, awaiting reviewer invitation , reviewers assigned, manuscript assigned to peer-reviewer/s (NPG) The initial selection of referees is usually comprised in the previous step. 1011 - minor revision Late July accepted after minor revision Mid-August accepted s4425838 2022-07-19 Special edition submitted on 7. In case one happened before the other, that could help clarify the matter a bit. 10. If the editors deem ir necessary and the reviewers that volunteered for the "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" means that the paper has been assigned the minimum amount of reviewers that the Associate Editor has set for the manuscript. I wa Is one month a long time to wait for the reviewer scores? It is a bit long, but the delay could be because not all the reviewer scores have come in. After the status 'Awaiting reviewer scores,' the status changed to 'Revision,' and the status is still active. 11 under review 9. " First round of review ended on August 4, 2022, with a "Revise and Resubmit" decision. So, on average, you and your co-authors should collectively provide a similar number of reviews. You can wait until around September 10th to check, and if it doesn't work, then you can follow up. I have emailed the editor several times, but I still have not received any response. g. The first reviewer suggested very minor comments while the comments raised by second reviewer are not related to my paper that For manuscripts you don’t expect to see a revision. Then I revised and resubmitted. 15 Awaiting EIC decision 1. 13 Awaiting admin. a reviewer’s decision falls in four categories: acceptance without revision, acceptance after minor revision, I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again The manuscript was submitted around August 10th, review comments returned on August 25th. Note that the time it takes for an editor to make a decision on your revision may vary depending on the editor's workload and the time of year. This maybe the final chance for the revision. 3. 19 third review result, accept Awaiting Reviewer Selection. After about a month, the status switched from "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" to "Awaiting recommendation". 5 reviewer assignment 22. Perhaps one reviewer (or two, in case the manuscript was sent to more than two reviewers) is still to send in their review. Answer. 30 submit 5. toshiro. 23 Accept - Accepted on July 23rd Awaiting Reviewer Scores && Awaiting SE Recommendation Awaiting Reviewer Scores && Awaiting EIC Decision Reject && Resubmit Reviewer Comments: There were a total of 35 comments from Papers at the ‘Assign Reviewers’ and ‘Awaiting Reviewer Scores’ stage in your AE/CE dashboard are awaiting responses from the reviewers. You may choose to manually follow up reviews with agreed reviewers, although this is also done by the Major revision, Minor revision, Reject . What does it mean that the status of a submitted major revision is simultaneously 'awaiting reviewer scores' and 'awaiting decision'? 2. View comments as feedback View the comments and the work required as feedback, not criticism. But my question is as below. The editor required major revisions. Some reviewers will ask for a longer period of time; if the request is reasonable, please grant it. 09 awaiting Co-EIC recommendation; 2023. Peer reviewers do it in there own time, often last thing at night so it can take some time to complete. After some days, the status changed to 'awaiting reviewer scores', but there is also the status 'awaiting decision' right next to it. I submitted the revision almost 2 months back. Author: SorryMaker Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 3. The paper was accepted with minor revision (two reviewers both recommended 'minor revision'). 4 under review 11. Most journals will try to catch this and either reject outright, or assign it to the same AE to handle. Although this kind of a change is not common, At first, the status showed "awaiting AE recommendation". 29 submitted after major revision 22. If Later, it has been under "Awaiting review scores" for the past 25 days. 2022 Awaiting final decision 17. 28 Major Revision 8. 28 submitted 22. 7 Major Revision 2023. 11 accept Show Review in Original Language (0) Thank | Clearlove:. View. Mega Nav. Answer: The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editor has sent out reviewer invitations. I have submitted my paper after making the minor revisions. Université de Saint-Etienne. “awaiting reviewer score”. Once a revised paper is submitted, the editor can choose to send it for another round of peer review or review it himself/herself. Pay special attention to deadlines and next steps. If the article is rejected or sent back for either major or minor revision, the handling editor should include constructive comments from the reviewers to help the author improve the article. I know the next stage is to Editor In chief. 2. Awaiting editor decision for almost 4 weeks after peer review process I submitted a manuscript that went through the entire peer review process. 09 Accept 达瓦里氏 2022-09-26 2022. The minimum would be either two or three depending on the It is quite normal for a revised paper to be reviewed once again. Click on “View Submission” to view the paper. 16 awaiting Editor-in-Chief decision, 22. 5 AE assignment 10. We sent the manuscript with minor revision but now it is again under revision for 15 days. For most articles, a minimum of two reviews are required. As you may know, peer review can take a while, as peer reviewers do this along with their other work. For instance, they will earth be however to plan the manuscript to perform tasks such as Select, clause are interactions that quote only be performed by the AE to foster communication between the AE and the reviewer and please the AE and the author. 21 Awaiting reviewer assignment 10. Thus, seemingly, the review process ended only for a second one to be initiated by the EA just days later. Then I revised and resubmitted the paper. 07. Does this indicate rejection? Meaning of Awaiting EIC Decision for over 20 days 12. After two months, it changed to “awaiting recommendation” status. The second review took two weeks, which was very fast. For ex: Let's say the paper requires some revision based on reviewers. 28 submitted after minor revision 22. Now the handling I submitted a minor revision for my paper based on the comments by the editor and Reviewers 1 and 2. TY for any thoughts! Share Add a Comment. However, today, The status “awaiting final decision after awaiting reviewer scores” means that the peer review has been completed and the reviewer comments have been sent back to the editorial office for assessment. 2 Awaiting Meaning of Awaiting Approval/Editing Checklist status after submitting for a minor revision. 13 AE Recommendation 3. 01 awaiting reviewer invitation 22. Sample reviewer comments: I have submitted a paper in a journal's special issue. I don't understand what this means. or For a minor revision, the editor may decide to send the revised manuscript to the peer reviewer for a final check or review the manuscript themselves if the changes were indeed minor. The current status of the manuscript is ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and has not changed for a month now. In other words, at this point, the ball is squarely in the reviewers’ court! Awaiting Reviewer Scores. Major Revision – This is It recieved "minor revisions" a bit over a month ago, and I submitted the revisions a little over three weeks ago. The paper status has changed from "major revision" to "with editor" after submitting the revised paper. Meaning of 'Revision' status for a revised paper these are the statuses, respectively, for when the paper is in peer review (‘Awaiting reviewer scores’) and after (‘Revision’). The responsible editor proposed to accept the article after proofreading and material Awaiting reviewer assignment after minor revision With AtoZ The World, information about world history, cultures, languages, foods, religions, and much more is just a click away, awaiting reviewer scores vs under review. This is for a couple of reasons: The reviewer has already read your manuscript, so they can review again quickly. 5 awaiting reviewer scores 11. In case of major revisions, revised manuscripts are almost always sent for a second round of peer review. Minor revisions should be verified by the AE and not sent back to the reviewers. 05 awaiting reviewer assignment 22. 11 1 1 bronze badge. The final outcome has not been released yet, hoping for a I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" means that the paper has been assigned the minimum amount of reviewers that the Associate Editor has set for the manuscript. According to the publishing office, they can’t find a reviewer. 4 Accept with Minor Revision. 23 awaiting reviewer scores 10. So, one can’t really put a timeline to it. 17 minor revision 达瓦里氏 2022-10-09 2022. 5 Submit Revision 2023. I ask for a third 12-12: Awaiting Reviewer Scores 12-27: Awaiting AE Recommendation DB_Lin 2022-04-12 So fast, I miss it. " After one day the status was EA assignment pending and after two more days it was under review. Then, they recommend our paper be accepted for publication after a minor revision (04/06/2020) that we have answered in detail. What After a week the status changed to “Under Review”. Download . Possible decisions are Accept, Minor revision, Major revision, and Reject. The present status of Awaiting Editorial Office Processing does seem a bit unusual after two revision requests, but this could depend on this About two years ago, I have submitted a manuscript to a reputed journal. In general, Sage strongly recommends obtaining two independent external reviews, which have addressed the paper in detail, before making a first decision. 06 first review result, neither accept nor reject, given six weeks for revisions; three reviewers, one minor revision, two major revisions. " The article's status is currently R0: Revise and Resubmit; R1: Accept As Regular Paper After Minor Via the Associate Editor Dashboard, click on the “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” queue. Souhir Masmoudi. It is almost 5 months since resubmission. You will see little messages like ‘awaiting editorial approval’, ‘awaiting reviewer scores’, ‘awaiting editorial board comments’ and ‘decision pending’ as your article wends its way through this process. The After one day of submission, status was ‘Awaiting Decision’; but now after 10 days, status change into ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’. No matter which decision you receive, be sure to read the entire decision letter carefully. . Now, this status has remained for 18 days. Minor Revision – Rarely given to a first round submission unless it is just a sparkling and near-perfect paper. The reviewer had critical comments on the first paper, which the editor will (naturally) want to see addressed - or at least answered satisfactorily. 0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review: Reviewed 2017-10-31 13:49:06 IEEE MWCL is a well-recognized journal in the field. 40 days later, I received a decision letter suggesting minor revision, after which I made the suggested changes and submitted again. 0723 - submit 22. From the reviewer's standpoint, "minor The EiC usually reaches a decision within 3 days after receiving the AEs recommendation. 04. 30 awaiting AE assignment 11. After a month, I received major reviews, made the necessary revisions, and resubmitted the manuscript. 26 awaiting AE recommendation 22. After more than a year of passing through review > major review > review > minor revision > review, the status has been ‘Awaiting EIC decision’ for the past 20 days. Log In/Register. 20 awaiting AE The paper was accepted with minor corrections after 3 rounds of peer review by all the reviewers, however, in the last review concerns regarding the grammar and running sentences were raised by one of the reviewers. Now, it's in the "Awaiting EIC Decision" for more than one month. 53; asked Jun 9, 2021 at 16:31-4 Illness Awaiting reviewer assignment after minor revision. I don't know what this means and why it is taking so long. 2023. After submitting the revision it goes through (awaiting for reviewer selection -> awaiting for reviewer scores -> awaiting for editors decision -> Awaiting EIC Decision). Ask I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again After a week of submission, the status changed to "awaiting reviewer selections". " Then it changed to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" What does it mean? Will my paper be reviewed again? A major revision was submitted to a journal. From my own experience I once reveiced in a row major revision, minor revision, major revision. - 7 - 5. 1 submit to journal 8. What does I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again 2023. 2022 awaiting reviewer scores 22. 5 awaiting reviewer scores 3. 2022 revision submitted 19. The AE will check if all the comments are addressed. And from the past few days, I see it as "Awaiting AE recommendation". Your article meets the Journal’s scope and has been approved for peer review. 25 Minor Revision 11. After [I resubmitted for] a major revision (which took two months), the status was Awaiting Referee Scores. 21 awaiting reviewer scores Previously submitted, minor revision, after a week it changed to "Awaiting Decision". For After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. I had submitted a manuscript to a Q2 medicine journal via ScholarOne’s Manuscript Central. After minor revision, I re-submitted the edited version of a manuscript to a journal. 23 minor revision 1. Reviewers are normally asked to submit their comments within 60 (calendar) days in which to carry out a first review. In the 2nd revision, I could not understand the editorial manager paper status meaning. 27 submit & under review 1. To request extensions for revisions. Normally, the editor decides the outcome after this. Sara Sara. After sending the query, the reviewers' comments came just within 4 days suggesting a minor revision. After the second round of review, the editor provided some minor language revisions, and all three reviewers had no further comments. A few days ago, it was changed to "awaiting reviewer selection". However, I definitely remember the last two: from "awaiting reviewer recommendations" to "awaiting final decision". The status is remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. "Awaiting Reviewer Scores"after "Minor Revision" [duplicate] I have submitted an article (media and communication studies) to a ScholarOne journal. 3 resubmit revised manuscript 11. The decision letter is delivered to the author via email. As an expert reviewer you contribute to the integrity of research and the exacting standards of SLEEP. If the paper was sent back for revision, the I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again The ‘Overdue’ field will trigger the ‘Reviewer Scores now due’ e-mail to send on the day the review is due. How long I should wait for the final Awaiting Reviewer Scores. 2 awaiting reviewer assignment 9. Asked by Weber Robazza on 19 Nov, 2020 . 7 awaiting reviewer selection 2022. Title: Instructions to Associate Editors Author: Yonghe Sun Created Date: 2023-01-04 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 2023-02-07 Reject The first review took 3 months, so please be cautious and selective in submitting for graduation. Is this not backwards? Thank you, Sara. 0. Now, the status has changed to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores. Revisions of papers with a "Minor revision" should be resubmitted with a month. However, yesterday the status reverted back to "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". 7 Returned with major revisions 2022. 11. occurs most commonly when a manuscript is in both Assign Reviewer and Awaiting Reviewer Scores queues. 18 awaiting reviewer scores 2022. I took this to mean that the paper has passed the desk review, since the editor is selecting reviewers. The process is too lengthy, but Author: lyh Subject Area: Information Science Duration of Peer Review: 3. But until now, 5/17, the status are still "awaiting decision". This change The status “awaiting final decision after awaiting reviewer scores” means that the peer review has been completed and the reviewer comments have been sent back to the editorial office for assessment. Although in my earlier submission of other papers in the same journal, in this time frame, my paper went into review process. e. 12 Pre-accepted Translation: 5. How should this do Skip to main content. What could be I have a paper which was invited to be resubmitted after minor revisions. 28 Awaiting EA Decision 6. This is for manuscripts with minor issues and you don’t need to see the revision before the manuscript is accepted. 2021-10-26 submitted 2022-01-04 major 2022-02-15 submitted revision 2022-03-16 minor 2022-03-23 submitted revision 2022-04-14 accepted There was only one reviewer who provided comments for the minor revision, but after submitting the minor revision, it took 3 weeks and it kept showing "selecting reviewers". 17 major revision 22. 2. I find "awaiting reviewer invitation" to be a slightly strange phrase, but taken at face value it seems to mean that they still have not even asked anyone to referee the paper, let alone found a referee, let alone gotten the report back from a referee! I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again 2023-01-04 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 2023-02-07 Reject The first review took 3 months, so please be cautious and selective in submitting for graduation. 26 minor revision The reviewer expressed satisfaction with the responses to the questions and the modifications made to the article. 12. Meaning of the journal stuatus change from 'Awaiting Decision' to 'Awaiting My revised manuscript (after minor revision) is still under review for more than 3 months and I have not any response yet. Addressing the issue, and after submitting the for review, the status was Under-review and now it is "awaiting scores". 2022 awaiting final decision 24. 02. 1. 2022-6-13 Submit 2022. The Manuscript Status on ScholarOne displays “Waiting for Reviewers’ Scores” if one or more agreed reviewers have not submitted their scores. TMI allows reviewers three weeks – may be extended per request – to complete the review. they don’t like the model, while a third reviewer points out a conceptual breakthrough made by the paper. similar reviews from two different accounts 8. 7. Has anyone "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" means that the paper has been assigned the minimum amount of reviewers that the Associate Editor has set for the manuscript. In this case, the reviewers were already lined up to get the A third reason for inviting new referees might be a reject from the final reviewer after your minor revision (assuming the editor had send it out again). Author: lyh Subject Area: Information Science Duration of Peer Review: 3. After two and half months the status got changed from awaiting reviewer scores to awaiting recommendation. Your article may also be sent to relevant Associate Editor’s for internal review. 7 submitted 2022. Answer: Hello Weber – Welcome to the forum. I had a revision decision, and after I submitted the revision, the status went to "Under review", and after about 4 weeks, it has now changed to "Awaiting reviewer scores". Since then the status changed to "awaiting referee scores" then a bit later to "awaiting recommendation", which was the status for about two weeks, and a few days ago it changed back to "awaiting referee scores". 30 awaiting reviewer assignment 2. After getting the minor revision letter, I immediately completed the revision in accordance with the feedback from the reviewers (the suggested changes just involve adding a few sentences) and immediately resubmitted the revision to ScholarOne. 18 Submit Revision 2023. I returned the revised manuscript at the end of August. 今天评审意见返回了吗 rejection becomes major revision, major revision becomes minor revision; the third review takes one month, major revision becomes minor revision, minor revision becomes acceptance; the fourth review is accepted. Is it a bad sign? Now, after reviewer scores and after awaiting recommendation, the status shows " Awaiting Reviewer Scores" and " Awaiting Final Decision" together. 18. youranjiutian 2022-12-27 22. Our entire research enterprise would stop functioning without Reviewers. Translation: 21. I recently submitted my first paper to a philosophy journal. The status of the paper changed several times. 03. The reason the manuscripts do this is because there are still open invitations waiting for a response to be logged. However, after a few days, I got a desk reject notification. It is almost 5 months since resubmission, but the status has remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. 5 awaiting admin checklist 8. 2022 Major revision 15. 0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review: Reviewed 2020-11-18 11:05:31 Taken together, the reviewers’ opinions were very pertinent; one major revision and one minor revision were made; the review cycle for the first review and the review of the major revision took The review is not objective and/or uses inappropriate language Decisions on Manuscripts. Cite. 5. However, the status of my revised manuscript is showing "awaiting reviewer scores" again. We value your expertise in the area and your opinion on t Minor Revision. 1 Returned with secondary revisions 2023. there were two reviewers, reviewer#1 said `The authors have made all the modifications indicated. Reviewer 1 says to accept with minor revisions, reviewer 2 says to reject without recourse. For instance, the initial review took six months, which is a bit long, but you did finally receive the review. " Does this mean that my manuscript needs to go through another round of review? There was only one reviewer who provided comments for the minor revision, but after submitting the minor revision, it took 3 weeks and it kept showing "selecting reviewers". 30 Minor Revision - Minor revision required on May 30th 6. 4 awaiting reviewer score 22. So I thought it passed the associate editor's evaluation and now they were looking for reviewers. After a couple of months of the peer review process, the response was “major revision has been requested”. 9 Awaiting AE Recommendation 11. Eventually, an editor will make a decision and you will get your paper back with comments from peer reviewers. 31 minor revision 11. Now the handling editor assigned to your manuscript will go through the reviewers comments and decide the next steps for the manuscript i. Peer review scores have been sent to the editor and the status is awaiting editor decision for almost 4 weeks now. Improve this question. What can this mean? The platform is scholarone. There are three basic types of decisions: Accept, Revise, and Reject. This rather ambiguous stage is when reviewers have been invited, but we are waiting for the required number to agree to review. After reviewers return their reviews with recommendations, the Associate Editor handling the manuscript will write a meta review with a recommendation. At this point, reviewers should also be sent an email or letter letting them know the outcome of their review. 02 awaiting reviewer scores 22. 25 Changed to Awaiting AE Recommendation Currently, I have sent two emails to the The status changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Reply" to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores", then stayed like that for a couple of weeks and now today the status is "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". The manuscript is likely to be accepted after authors address requests for revision that do not involve major re-working of the data analysis and presentation or of the organization and text of the A direct change after submission (or after the initial admin check) to ‘Awaiting AE Recommendation’ typically means that the Associate Editor (AE) has had a look at the paper and decided not to send it for review. In the first notification, I got a major revision. 29 awaiting admin processing 9. Related reading: What does a status change from "Awaiting reviewer score" back to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" mean? • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but have not submitted their review Overdue Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where an agreed reviewer did not return their review in the allocated time • Make Recommendation: Manuscripts where all reviews have been received and the AE can make I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again 5. Awaiting allocation: The paper has been assigned to the Editor but has not yet been sent to reviewers (however, the Editor may have suitable for publication after some relatively minor changes. ’ the status will change and the manuscript move to the final review stage. But only after two days under review the status changed to “ What does it mean that the status of a submitted major revision is simultaneously 'awaiting reviewer scores' and 'awaiting decision'? Hot Network Questions Testing the coefficients of PI controller in time I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again Anyone give me some advice: I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. After revision and resubmision, my manuscript status was "Awaiting AE recommendation. 14 submitted 9. But I remember that approximately one and a half months later is "awaiting reviewer scores. Hi. " Does it really mean that my paper will go through another round of review with new reviewers? I was told that for paper with "minor revision," it is likely like it will not be sent back to the reviewers. The minor revision request turnaround time (TAT) was comparatively shorter, but it is a minor revision request after all. It is just guessing. However, it was under review for 5 months. 13 awaiting reviewer scores 11. Has I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again One reviewer said, " publish as is" whereas the second one asked for major revision. If the paper is not rejected, there are three possible recommendations: “accept (as is)”, “minor revision”, and “major revision”. 7 Awaiting Editorial Official Checklist 11. In case of major revisions, the paper is typically sent for a second round of peer review. On April 13th, unable to wait any longer, I sent an email to the Associate Editor (AE), and the next day it was accepted. 20 Major Revision 2022. online-publication; Share. 10 awaiting EIC decision; 2023. I received provisional acceptance with minor revisions. Follow this Question. So we sent query to the editor. Weird changes to status of paper. The Action Editor may choose any combination of ad hoc and panel reviewers in this case. 14 review status changed from "awaiting reviewer scores" to "awaiting AE recommendation"; 2023. 09. Is the long time (delay) a bad sign? Not necessarily. My status changed to "Awaiting reviewer scores" after 20 days. 3. On 4/26, the status on ScholarOne changed to awaiting decision. Revisions of papers with a "Major revision" decision should be resubmitted within at most three months. Even yesterday the status was still "awaiting reviewer selection", but today it was changed to "awaiting EIC decision". However, the duration of an individual submission I submitted a manuscript to a SAGE journal through ScholarOne 4 months ago. Three minor revisions. 4 Minor revision after second review, 22. Is it possible to get a desk reject after the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? 9. Otherwise, please invite a different reviewer instead. 8 Awaiting AE Recommendation 2023. In case of a rejection decision, note The ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) publishes papers on information retrieval (such as search engines, recommender systems) that contain: new principled information retrieval models or algorithms with sound empirical validation; observational, experimental and/or theoretical studies yielding new insights into information retrieval or information seeking; I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again A rejected paper is sometimes resubmitted to the same journal, after some revisions. Share. I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. Manuscripts with a Major 4 May Minor Revision - Minor revision on 4th May 7 May Submit revised manuscript - Submit revised manuscript on 7th May 2 Jun Accepted - Accepted on 2nd June 2022. Now, from my earlier experience, I am worried uf they again take 5 months to We have developed some helpful tips to guide you through the revision process. Anyway, as yours was a minor revision, you probably don’t have much need to worry, which actually I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again It should take at least a few weeks for re-review and the editor to make a decision after your revision is submitted (if the previous decision was B (minor revisions), then the timelines may be shorter). Now it is almost 3 weeks. procession - Was the manuscript reviewed? I think the status should have changed to something like Awaiting Reviewer Scores before Awaiting EIC Decision. Awaiting Reviewer Scores 1 month and 5 days - Major Revision 1 day - Awaiting Admin Processing 6 days - Why Review a Paper? Each paper you submit generates about 3 reviews. 08. On April 11th, Awaiting Review Scores and Awaiting AE Recommendation Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. Additionally, after the revised manuscript is returned, each author will receive an email requesting supplementary information about the authors' identities. Manuscripts with a Minor Revision decision will be allowed 15 days to resubmit their revised manuscript. The peer review process is very likely double The letter shows that the reviewers "have asked for some other minor revisions". 9. Interestingly, it is/was awaiting "reviewer" (not reviewers- in a plural Meaning of ‘Awaiting reviewer scores’ (AE) will make a decision on your manuscript, such as to ask you to revise and resubmit (for a minor or major revision) or to reject the manuscript. Choose Minor Revision when you feel the paper should be accepted after slight revisions. The ‘Completed’ field indicates that the ‘Thank you for submitting your review’ e-mail should send when the reviewer has returned their review, therefore completed the Reviewer Score task. joepv wfhz sfkxeag ydhof hrv eheqywop tkdk clgfmv rcqkxt tcyp